An
Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure
Old
truisms like this one persist because they contain wise advice.
Unfortunately, while we all know them to be true, we often
aren't so good about implementing the advice.
Many of my patients do a very good job of researching their
health problems. Many put lots of energy into sorting out what supplements might
be good for them. However,
relatively few of them adequately attend to the basic health screenings
they should receive. Fewer
still come in to go over their lifestyle habits to prevent disease
or learn how to improve the way they feel on a day to day basis.
In the rush of life we tend to overlook things until they
force us to take notice.
I
recommend that patients come in every year or two, even if they
feel well, so that we can discuss their health habits. Part of this review is going over their
diet looking for problem areas.
If they have been in before, I will try to learn if they
have been acting on my previous recommendations or if the recommendations
should change. Every year there are literally millions
of new research findings published in medical journals. As we learn more, I work to incorporate
the best parts of what we have learned into my recommendations to
patients. As medical
researchers have finally begun to research alternative medicines
and dietary supplements, we are learning so much so fast that it
is simultaneously wonderful and overwhelming. My family can tell you of the mounds of
medical journals I plow through every week. I even keep a stock of them in my car so I can read whenever
I have an opportunity.
This
article is focused on the health screening that I recommend.
Please go to Fundamental Health Habits
on my website to read about what I believe we all need to do on
our own to be healthy and happy.
Beginning Before
Birth
Prenatal
care is preventive medicine. It is the most purely wellness-oriented
aspect of conventional medical care.
Prenatal care is also unquestionably one of the most successful
aspects of conventional medical care.
It saves lives, leads to healthier children and saves money. I would like to see more parents educated
about diet, supplement and lifestyle interventions that appear to
have great potential for improving the wellbeing of their coming
child not to mention the soon-to-be delightedly stressed parents.
Childhood
Continuing through the life cycle,
well child exams are a justifiably popular means of screening children
for health problems. Many problems, can be identified
early and then treated before they become significant. In some cases, like hip dislocations or
strabismus, delayed treatment can make the problem very difficult
to treat succesfully.
In
addition, these visits provide a fantastic opportunity for health
education. New parents should receive support informationally
and often emotionally in these visits. Experienced parents can get help sorting
how to deal with the new and different model now in their possession. The physician learns about the new patient
and his/her family while providing preventive health education. In some cases it can be important to screen
for anemia or environmental toxins (lead for example).
The
nutritional needs of children are quite different from those of
adults. Also, dietary
choices made in the formative years have life long repercussions. US government data tell us that 30-70%
of American children are deficient in some of the most common vitamins
(E, C & A). Despite
this fact, very few pediatricians routinely inquire about their
patients' dietary habits.
After
completing the customary run of well child visits by age 2, I like
to see healthy children every 2-3 years to go over their diet, conduct
a physical examination and address any health related questions. This becomes most important around the
major growth spurts because overlooked chronic nutritional inadequacies
often lead to disease or worse when the body lacks the nutrients
needed to fuel its transformation.
Children
increasingly participate in sports with a specialized dedication
making them more susceptible to a variety of injuries.
For example, girls playing sports that involve explosive
directional changes like soccer, volleyball, basketball and skiing
have a major risk for serious knee injuries peaking in the mid teenaged
years. Children and
adults for that matter who play contact sports (football, soccer,
boxing, skiing, horse riding) are at risk for head injuries. We now have exercise regimens proven to
reduce the risk of knee injuries and computerized testing to follow
subtle signs of brain injury guiding decisions about safe return
to competition.
Teenagers -
Yikes
As
the officially designated source of societal debate, frustration,
controversy and criticism teens have a heavy responsibility to challenge
the assumptions of the rest of us. Although I can understand the reasons for friction between
parents and their teens, I enjoy working with them. Maybe that has something to do with my lifelong role as an
agitator.
In
my experience it is very important for me to see my young patients
again during this time of their life. One reason is that they need to know that I am their
doctor and, limited by threats to themselves and others, I can be
a confidential source of information.
As their lives change, so do their risks and inevitably their
responsibility for their own health.
I
have mixed feeling about vaccinations but maybe the most important
vaccination to consider is the hepatitis B vaccine. It is usually administered to infants
because of the "we've got them in our clutches" public
health attitude. Except when family members are hepatitis
B carriers, children are not at risk for hepatitis B until they
begin dating.
Just
as with the rest of the lifecycle, prevention is better than treatment
so this is a critical time for education about high-risk behaviors,
diet and exercise. The
old fear about marijuana use leading to addiction to "harder"
drugs may have some truth to it but we know for certain that cigarette
smoking is clearly and strongly associated with subsequent drug
and alcohol abuse.
On
to Adulthood
Standard medical
care starts out pretty well by uncharacteristically focusing on
prevention, but then loses the plot neglecting labor-intensive health
promotion counseling. This has always seemed odd to me because health
care is largely about education, not just writing prescriptions
hand-over-fist.
Once again,
a thorough periodic examination of your diet, supplement usage,
exercise patterns and other lifestyle elements is a great way to
prevent disease while improving the quality of your life. Obesity
is becoming epidemic in our high carbohydrate, low activity society.
The health consequences are enormous and it is certainly easier
to reign in on the problem when you discover your weight has just
started to go up, than it is to drop serious poundage later on.
High blood
pressure is often a consequence of excessive weight gain, although
in many cases it appears in people whose weight is not markedly
abnormal. Unlike the visibility of weight gain, most people have
no idea that their blood pressure is elevated. People with hypertension
don't feel any different until years of increased blood pressure
have made their mark with heart disease or stroke or some other
nasty problem. Checking your blood pressure annually is a good idea.
I should mention
the growing discussion in the medical literature about when or if
doctors should check patient's blood pressures. Because there are
a significant number of people whose blood pressures are fine everywhere
except the physician's office, too many people are incorrectly diagnosed
with hypertension. Most of them are then placed on prescription
medications that they do not need, and from which they suffer adverse
effects. I usually check my patient's blood pressures periodically
and, if elevated, I urge them to check it again themselves every
morning for a week or two. There is a new generation of highly accurate,
easy and maybe even fun-to-use blood pressure monitors, so checking
it yourself is not a big deal.
Periodic blood
screening for diabetes and lipid abnormalities (elevated cholesterol,
serum c-reactive protein) is anything from a good idea to crucially
important, depending upon your family history, weight and lifestyle
habits.
Mens Health
Unfortunately, men tend
to be relatively oblivious to preventive health care. That may explain
why we tend to live a couple of years less than women. Just as women
are more vulnerable to certain health problems, men have our own
weaknesses.
Testicular cancer is
the most common form of cancer in 15-34 year old males, and the
second most common in 35-39 year old men. This cancer can be diagnosed
easily. All it takes is a physical examination, and young men should
learn to do this for themselves.
Annual digital prostate
exams are a good idea after age 50, or even much younger if symptoms
warrant. Blood testing using the PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen)
test has its uses, but unfortunately, it is very prone to false
positives. As a result, many men have undergone needless procedures,
some of which have often led to serious long-term ill effects. As
the years go by, the test is getting refined, which increases the
accuracy and decreases the false positive rate.
Womens Health
Young women need to
be concerned about cervical cancer screening. This preventable cancer
is most common in young sexually active women. Regular PAP smears
should start within 3 years of first intercourse. Bimanual pelvic
exam is also important because it can help us diagnose ovarian cysts,
ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids and a number of other problems.
Examinations should be repeated annually until 30 or 35, and then
every 3 years until age 65. Women who are at higher risk (DES daughters
or granddaughters, multiple sexual partners, immunosuppression)
should be screened annually. Women who have had a hysterectomy do
not need PAP smears.
Mammograms are a controversial
and confusing topic these days. Mammograms can detect breast cancers
1-3 years before they can be felt. But, there are many falsely abnormal
mammograms, particularly in women under age 50. Maybe breast exams
can help, especially if performed well. Then again, further adding
to the confusion, one recent massive study in China found no benefit
of breast self-exam, even when women had received instruction in
proper examination techniques. How can that be when most breast
cancers are still discovered by women examining their breasts intentionally
or unintentionally?
So my recommendations
are: First--stay tuned. New technologies are in development that
promise more reliable information, everything from breast MRI to
electrical impedance to ductal lavage with microfiberoptic equipment.
Second--consider your family history and other risks for breast
cancer (early onset of menses, no breast feeding, use of hormones,
alcohol consumption, weight gain after menopause). Third--I think
there is a role for breast self examination, but we just don't know
what it is. The same can be said of professional clinical breast
exams. You should consider mammograms every other year, especially
if you are between the ages of 50 and 70, have a close family history
of breast cancer or have a number of risk factors for the disease.
One other note is that I do not think that breast thermography is
a useful tool. It is just doesn't give enough consistent or meaningful
information.
Ovarian cancer
screening is another area of evolving controversy. At this time,
the most useful predictive factor is family history. An American
woman with no family history of ovarian cancer has a 1.2% lifetime
risk of developing the disease. If one relative has had ovarian
cancer, her risk goes up to 5%, and 7% if two relatives have had
the disease. There is also a rare genetically inherited syndrome
that increases the risk drastically - 40% lifetime risk.
The CA-125 blood
test has gotten a great deal of attention as a screening test. The
numbers from a large (22,000 women) study in the United Kingdom
highlight the limitations of this blood test. Of the 11,000 women
receiving the CA-125 test annually, 16 developed ovarian cancer.
However, the blood test was not very good at finding them. Of the
468 women who tested positive, only 6 had ovarian cancer. The other
10 women with ovarian cancer had tested negative.
Another blood
test of a tumor marker, lysophosphatidic acid, looks like it may
be better, but it needs to be evaluated in screening studies to
learn if it is adequately sensitive to use for screening.
Women who are
at very high risk for ovarian cancer (family history, Northern European
descent and never pregnant) might consider taking oral contraceptives,
as they appear to significantly reduce the risk of ovarian cancer.
Osteoporosis
screening is recommended for women at age 65, but I think it is
a big mistake to wait until then. As bone density declines sharply
following menopause, I recommend a DEXA bone density at the onset
of menopause. That way you can take action to prevent osteoporosis,
instead of getting backed into a corner having to consider prescription
medication.
As We Age
As the time
we have left gets shorter, the likelihood of significant health
problems inevitably increases. Colon cancer is one of the best examples
of a health screening success story. This is a very common cancer
with good evidence that early treatment saves lives.
After age 50 every one
should have an annual stool blood test (guaiac), looking for invisible
blood in the stool. Also, either a sigmoidoscopy every 5 years,
double contrast barium enema every 5 years or a colonoscopy every
10 years looks to be a good idea. A sigmoidoscopy is easier and
cheaper, but it only looks at the last 30% of the colon. In my opinion,
patients with a family history of colon cancer, especially in relatives
under age 50, should start colon cancer screening even younger.
So called "virtual
colonoscopy" is a fancy X Ray test (CT scan) of the colon.
While this test identifies polyps like colonoscopy, the patient
must then undergo regular colonoscopy to biopsy the polyps. In traditional
colonoscopy, any polyp can be easily biopsied, and often the simple
removal of the polyp is therapeutic, as the polyps then cannot follow
their common natural history and become cancerous. I do not like
the radiation exposure virtual colonoscopy requires.
I am skeptical about
the new wave of body scans. They are marketed to the public as an
accurate means of disease screening, but there are drawbacks. The
radiation exposure is considerably less than years ago, but still
considerable. We all have a variety of "defects", and
you have to ask what good it does to find more of them. Sometimes
even finding a cancer early only leads to interventions which make
the patient suffer without leading to a longer or more enjoyable
life. In some rare circumstances these scans might save a life,
but what about the worry over something which might never have caused
you symptoms, the risk of the radiation, your potential uninsurability
after something is discovered, the cost .? I think this is more
of an individual decision based upon your intuition, than it is
a clear cut medical decision.
Years of exposure to
the sun and environmental toxins can lead to skin cancer. I recommend
an annual skin exam after age 40. In addition to the clinical features
that tell us that a skin lesion is likely to be malignant, a new
technology, well established for years in Europe, helps distinguish
cancers from "funny looking" moles. This simple hand held
device is a polarized light. I have found it helpful and very easy
to use.
There are a few other
tests that I think have a role in health screening.
Many patients experience
low energy or immune dysfunction from low levels of iron without
knowing it, because most physicians do not know to test the body's
store of iron. It is very well established that physical abilities
are hampered and patients have symptoms because of low iron, even
when they are not anemic. The simplest blood test for body iron
stores is ferritin. Among my patients, 20-25% of females in their
40's have low iron stores.
Thyroid deficiency is
also very common. As laboratory technology has improved dramatically
at measuring low levels of hormones, we can screen for low thyroid
with a simple blood test. I do not agree with those who contend
that morning body temperature is an accurate gauge of thyroid function.
When I worked as an
emergency room physician years ago, I would often see patients with
chest pain for which it was difficult to determine the cause. In
the past few years, some rapid blood tests have appeared, improving
diagnostic accuracy, but I still think it is a good idea for any
adult who has had an EKG to carry a copy of it in his/her wallet.
That way an ER doc can compare it to a new EKG if you have chest
pain.
I believe that periodic
eye examinations, including glaucoma screening, are a good idea.
The future promises many
new blood tests for cancer markers, and a variety of health assessment
tools using light to examine body tissues. We have a long way to
go before we advance to the "Star Trek" physical, but
as tools become finer they can tell us more while being less intrusive.
Finally
The subtlest instrument
in our possession continues to be the power of human perception
and intelligence. For this reason it is vital to consider your own
unique family history, tendencies, strengths and weaknesses. Just
so, it is important to seek the advice of someone who knows about
health and has the experience to understand your qualities.
Mark Twain wrote that
a man who has no vices may not live longer, but it will surely seem
that way. I like the humor, but in my experience living in the right
way is the best guarantee of living your life to the fullest in
every sense of the word.
top
|